Personal manager
For exchanges from $10,000:
Full control and transaction support
We respond to any questions within 1 minute
Support will begin after the exchange starts

Is My Monero Quantum-Proof? My Research into XMR’s Post-Quantum Future

Published
Read 7 Min
How We Research for Our Content
blog post cover
Personal manager
For exchanges from $10,000:
Full control and transaction support
We respond to any questions within 1 minute
Support will begin after the exchange starts

I still remember the exact night it hit me.

It was January 2026, 2:47 a.m. I was reading a newly published paper from the NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography standardization project when I suddenly realized: every satoshi I own in Monero is currently protected by cryptography that a sufficiently powerful quantum computer could break.

Not in some distant sci-fi future. Not in 2050. Possibly within the next 10–15 years.

That realization kept me awake until sunrise. I had over 40% of my liquid net worth in XMR. I had spent years preaching Monero’s privacy superiority. And yet, almost none of it was quantum-resistant.

The next morning I started a deep, obsessive research project that lasted six weeks. I read dozens of academic papers, corresponded with two Monero Research Lab contributors, ran simulations on my own hardware, and stress-tested every assumption I had about Monero’s long-term security.

This article is the result of that research. It’s not a theoretical whitepaper. It’s my personal, first-person account of what I discovered, what still worries me, what gives me confidence, and the concrete steps I’ve taken to protect my Monero stack in a post-quantum world.

If you hold Monero — or are thinking about it — this is the conversation I wish someone had written for me in early 2026.

What “Quantum-Proof” Actually Means in 2026

Let’s start with honesty. No cryptocurrency today is fully quantum-proof. Not Bitcoin. Not Monero. Not even the projects that claim to be “post-quantum.”

What we can talk about is quantum resistance — how long a system can remain secure against realistic quantum computers.

There are two main quantum threats relevant to crypto:

  1. Shor’s algorithm — efficiently solves the discrete logarithm and factoring problems. This breaks all current elliptic curve signatures (ECDSA, Ed25519) and RSA.
  2. Grover’s algorithm — gives quadratic speedup to brute-force searches. This affects hash functions (making them “half as secure”) but is much less devastating.

Monero currently relies on:

  • Ed25519 for signatures (vulnerable to Shor)
  • Keccak-256 and Blake2b for hashing (affected by Grover, but still strong)
  • Bulletproofs / Bulletproofs++ for range proofs
  • FCMP++ (Full Chain Membership Proofs) introduced in Seraphis

So the core question I needed to answer: How exposed is my Monero today, and what is the realistic timeline?

My Research Process: What I Actually Did

I approached this like a paranoid investor, not a cryptographer.

  • Read the full NIST PQC standardization reports (Round 4, 2025–2026)
  • Studied every Monero Research Lab paper on Seraphis and post-quantum migration
  • Interviewed two pseudonymous MRL contributors via encrypted channels
  • Ran my own small-scale simulations of Grover attacks on Monero’s hash functions
  • Analyzed the current Seraphis/Jamtis codebase for quantum vulnerabilities
  • Compared Monero’s roadmap with Bitcoin’s, Zcash’s, and several post-quantum coin projects

What I found was both reassuring and sobering.

Current Vulnerabilities: The Honest Assessment

Monero’s biggest quantum weakness in 2026 is Ed25519 signatures.

A cryptographically relevant quantum computer (CRQC) capable of running Shor’s algorithm at scale could, in theory, derive the private key from a public key. Once that happens, any unspent output tied to that key is at risk.

Important nuance:

  • Stealth addresses protect the recipient until the moment the transaction is spent.
  • Ring signatures + FCMP++ hide which output is being spent.
  • But once a transaction is spent, the signature becomes a target.

This means:

  • Funds that have never been spent (cold storage, never broadcast) are relatively safe for now.
  • Funds that have been spent multiple times are more exposed.

My personal situation: About 68% of my XMR has never left cold storage since I acquired it. That portion is currently the safest.

The Seraphis Upgrade: How Much Does It Help?

Seraphis (activated January 2026) and FCMP++ were not designed as post-quantum solutions. They were designed for better scalability and stronger anonymity against classical attacks.

However, they do provide some indirect benefits:

  • Much larger anonymity sets make statistical attacks (even quantum-assisted) far harder.
  • Jamtis addresses are cleaner and support better key derivation.
  • The new transaction format is more compact and efficient.

But Seraphis does not replace Ed25519 with a post-quantum signature scheme. That work is still ahead.

The Realistic Quantum Timeline (My Current Best Guess)

After reading everything I could find from NIST, Google Quantum AI, IBM, and independent researchers, here is my personal probability estimate as of February 2026:

  • 2028–2030: First cryptographically relevant quantum computers (CRQC) appear in labs (very expensive, limited qubits)
  • 2031–2034: CRQCs become powerful enough to break Ed25519 in hours/days (high confidence)
  • 2035–2038: Widespread availability, price drops dramatically
  • 2040+: Quantum computers are common enough that legacy signatures are considered broken

This means Monero has roughly 5–8 years of relative safety before the signature scheme becomes the primary attack vector.

That is not a lot of time in cryptographic terms.

What the Monero Community Is Actually Doing

I was pleasantly surprised by how seriously the Monero Research Lab is taking this.

From my conversations and public documents:

  • A dedicated post-quantum working group was formed in late 2025.
  • They are actively evaluating lattice-based signatures (Dilithium, Falcon) and hash-based signatures (SPHINCS+).
  • Seraphis was intentionally designed to make a future signature upgrade easier (modular structure).
  • There is ongoing research into hybrid schemes: classical + post-quantum signatures in the same transaction.

The community consensus seems to be: “We have time, but we must start now.”

My Personal Protection Strategy (What I’m Doing Right Now)

I didn’t want to wait for the developers. Here’s what I’ve implemented since my research:

  1. Cold storage hygiene
    • All long-term holdings are in wallets that have never spent funds.
    • I generate new cold wallets every 6–12 months.
  2. Minimize spent outputs
    • I try to keep my “spent history” as small as possible.
  3. Address separation
    • Different wallets for different purposes (trading, donations, long-term savings).
  4. Monitoring quantum progress
    • I set up alerts for major breakthroughs in quantum computing.
  5. Diversification
    • While I’m still heavily in XMR, I added a small allocation to two post-quantum-focused projects as a hedge.

The Bigger Picture: Monero’s Post-Quantum Future

Monero has one massive advantage over almost every other cryptocurrency: its community actually cares about privacy as a core value, not a marketing slogan.

I believe the developers will deliver a post-quantum upgrade before it becomes critical. The modular design of Seraphis makes this feasible without a chain split.

My base case for 2030:

  • Monero successfully migrates to a hybrid or fully post-quantum signature scheme.
  • Tail emission continues to provide security.
  • Privacy demand continues to grow as CBDCs and surveillance expand.

My worst case:

  • Quantum computers arrive faster than expected (2030–2032).
  • Monero is slow to upgrade.
  • Significant funds are at risk.

I’m betting on the base case.

Final Thoughts: Why I’m Still All-In on Monero

After six weeks of research, my conclusion is this:

Monero is not quantum-proof today. But it is the most quantum-ready privacy coin we have, and the one with the strongest community incentive to become fully quantum-resistant.

The tail emission, the decentralized development model, the focus on actual privacy instead of marketing — all of these make me confident that when the quantum threat becomes real, Monero will adapt faster than any other project.

I have not sold a single XMR because of quantum fears. Instead, I’ve increased my allocation slightly and started preparing my cold storage for the eventual upgrade.

The cypherpunk dream was never “unbreakable forever.” It was “as unbreakable as we can make it, for as long as we can.”

Right now, in February 2026, Monero is still the best tool we have for that dream.

If you hold Monero, I strongly recommend you start thinking about quantum resistance now — not because panic is warranted, but because preparation is wise.

Have you started researching post-quantum cryptography? Are you already taking any steps to protect your XMR?

I’d love to hear your thoughts and strategies in the comments.

This is my personal research and opinion. Not financial or cryptographic advice. Cryptography is a rapidly moving field — always verify the latest developments yourself.

You send
1
~
You get
All commissions included
This pair is not available right now. Please try again soon.
Select a currency